When handling close votes, I find myself spending more time mapping the question to a proper close reason than the OP spent energy writing the question. I'd like for there to be an option "no comment" for these kind of questions.
How Do i find how many section headers in PE file - C
What is an Section Header in PE file ? And how with c code can i count them ? I already tried to search in the web but didnt fount somthing that halped me .
See also the very illustrative comments:
I found information about PE file on the first Goolge hit for "PE file format"– pmg Apr 21 at 11:25
It dont helps me , i prefer that someone explains to me in his own words. –Original Poster Apr 21 at 11:34
You can look into MSDN. They are giving all the details msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms809762.aspx– Chaithra Apr 21 at 11:35
"Too broad" isn't an appropriate reason, the only appropriate reason is that the OP doesn't know how to use a search engine. Why can't we be explicit or totally generic and avoid reviewers wasting time on this?
The point of this question is to be able to make a clear distinction between questions that cannot be salvaged because the asker is clearly not capable or willing to do so.
It's about weighing the risk of wasting the reviewers' time against the risk of applying this reason to the wrong group of newbies. This question got closed as 'Too broad', and that prompts me to edit it. Sometimes prompting an OP to come back and edit is a waste of everyone's time.
Stack Overflow is quite good at protecting the system from spam, it's also great at improving itself, but it's not so good at protecting it from carelessness.